What Is a Tolling Order and When It Is Used

A tolling order is a court-issued tool that pauses the running of a statute of limitations or other time-bound deadlines in legal cases. It provides temporary relief from strict filing deadlines, allowing a case to proceed without the risk of dismissal due to missed timelines. In the United States, tolling orders can arise in civil, criminal, and administrative contexts, but they are most commonly discussed in civil litigation and bankruptcy settings. Understanding when and how tolling orders apply helps litigants protect their rights and pursue claims effectively.

What Is A Tolling Order

A tolling order temporarily suspends or extends the period within which a party must commence a legal action or take a required step. The underlying goal is to prevent the expiration of a deadline due to circumstances beyond a party’s control. Tolling orders can be granted for various reasons, including ongoing negotiations, pending related proceedings, or procedural delays caused by court backlogs. While the concept is simple, the specifics—such as who can petition for tolling, the duration of the toll, and the conditions that trigger tolling—vary by jurisdiction and context.

When Tolling Orders Are Typically Used

Tolling orders are commonly sought in situations where strict deadlines would undermine access to justice or fairness. Typical scenarios include:

✓

Quick, confidential phone check

Tell us the basics and we’ll point you to the right next step. No long forms.

Call Now

Phone: (855) 550-1270

Confidential • Fast • Helpful guidance

Pending discovery or the need for essential information not yet available.
Active participation in related proceedings that could affect the outcome of the main case.
Absence of a party or attorney due to illness, imprisonment, or deployment that temporarily prevents timely action.
Bankruptcy proceedings that pause state-law claims due to automatic stay provisions.
Class action or mass tort contexts where coordinating notices or complex settlement processes impact filing deadlines.

Courts consider factors such as diligence, prejudice to the opposing party, and public policy when deciding whether to grant a tolling order. A tolling order is not a guarantee; it must be justified by legitimate circumstances and consistent with statutory or procedural rules.

Types Of Tolling And How They Differ

Different forms of tolling reflect how and why deadlines are paused:

Equitable Tolling: A court may toll a deadline when a plaintiff demonstrates extraordinary circumstances—such as active efforts to pursue a claim but inability to do so due to factors beyond control. The standard is typically strict and requires a showing of diligence and a compelling reason for the delay.
Statutory Tolling: Some statutes explicitly provide that certain events extend or pause the limitation period. For example, statutory tolling can occur during the time a government agency is reviewing a related claim or during specific types of administrative proceedings.
Tolling By Court Order: A court may issue a tolling order to pause deadlines in the interest of justice. This is a formalized pause, often used when procedural issues or ongoing related litigation validate delaying a filing requirement.
Bankruptcy Tolling: When bankruptcy petitions are filed, certain state-law claims may be tolled due to an automatic stay, delaying outside litigation until the stay is lifted or resolved.

Each type has distinct triggers, durations, and limitations, and the availability of tolling must align with applicable law and court rules.

Key Considerations For A Tolling Order

Jurisdictional Rules: Tolling standards vary widely by state and federal jurisdiction. Always check local rules and precedents relevant to the case type.
Timing And Diligence: Courts often require timely requests and evidence of diligent pursuit of the claim before granting tolling.
Impact On Pleadings: Some jurisdictions require tolling petitions to be filed within specific windows or tied to particular stages of litigation.
Prejudice To Opposing Party: A tolling decision must consider potential prejudice to the other side, including impacts on witnesses, evidence, and docket backlog.
Duration And Renewal: Tolling orders typically specify a duration and may be subject to renewal if a compelling basis persists.

Practical Implications And Examples

Municipal and civil cases often illustrate tolling in practice. For instance, a plaintiff discovers a latent defect in a medical device well after the claim period expires. If the plaintiff can show due diligence and that discovery was delayed by factors beyond control, a court might toll the statute to permit filing. In bankruptcy, a department-store class action against a parent company might be paused while the company reorganizes, preventing simultaneous actions that could waste judicial resources. In some jurisdictions, tolling decisions are essential in wrongful termination or discrimination cases when filing deadlines intersect with administrative remedies or governmental investigations.

Proactive steps can help maximize the chance of a successful tolling request: documenting timelines, gathering evidence of obstacles, and submitting a well-reasoned motion with supporting affidavits. Conversely, delaying filing without justification can undermine a tolling request and lead to dismissal on statute-of-limitations grounds.

Differences Across Jurisdictions

States handle tolling with notable variability. Some states have rigid time bars with narrow exceptions, while others use broad equitable tolling standards. Federal courts follow established circuit patterns for equitable tolling, but outcomes can differ between circuits. Practitioners must consult the governing rules for the relevant jurisdiction, including any local court rules that specify how and when tolling motions must be made and proven.

✓